Harsh or Happy Realities?

I’ve accepted that I’m going to keep on making mistakes forever. The rest of the world will too. So my life will always be challenging, and the world will often be chaotic.

 

On the other hand, I’ve also come to realize that in any present moment I can always choose to see myself, others, and the world through spiritual eyes–peaceful, accepting eyes–and this small choice will change both my own reality and any reality “out there” in happy and often unknowable ways.

 

What does it mean, to see the world through spiritual eyes? It means to look for and see only the good. It means to let go of past mistakes, ours and everyone else’s, as well as future fears, and instead, focus, here and now, on the good that is right before us.

 

There’s a spiritual trick to all this, though. Whenever we react negatively toward ourselves and others—as we all often do, almost continuously, in fact, because we’re well-trained judgment machines—whenever we’re feeling judgmental and resistant, we can ask our favorite higher power to help us see that person or situation differently. If we’ll look, listen, and wait for our answer, we’ll soon see with new eyes, new sight.

 

Using this approach, I create every day, for myself and for others, a different, better reality than I could create alone.

 

As more and more people realize that acceptance of whatever and whoever we see is our primary work in this world, we can all relax. Instead of mirroring a fearful collective craziness, we’ll reflect the higher eternal truths and realities we all recognize during transcendent moments, when we know without question the love of God and the beauty and unity of his creation—however differently we explain such truth.

 

So, does seeing with new eyes mean we should we all fall into denial? Avoid looking at the bad stuff in our lives, and give up on changing or improving it? No. Asking for help in seeing things differently allows us to look more closely at all that is frightening and difficult in our lives—and this time, with acceptance and forgiveness. God will transform all of it into something useful and good.

 

Life will always bring up an endless stream of personal judgments and resistances begging for transformation. Although we’ve all made mistakes, none are so dark they can’t be made light if we so choose. All our relationships can be changed, all our sadness, our hard lessons turned to good purpose and peace.

 

Each of us is powerful far beyond anything we now believe. We’ve already shown ourselves powerful enough to project a whole world—a terrible one. And to see ourselves as hopeless cases. And everyone else as no better than we. Usually worse.

 

If we want something to be true, even if it’s some cruel reality we’ve settled on as the only kind we can rationally and honestly imagine, then soon enough we’ll find the evidence necessary to reinforce even such a sad belief system. We’ll no doubt react indignantly and angrily to the fearful world we’ve surrounded ourselves with, but we’ll continue to look for, reinforce, and initiate evidence for it, until eventually we make for ourselves not only a personal state of near-insanity, but a planetary madhouse as well.

 

Instead of resigning ourselves to chaos and despair, however, we can use our awesome creative power to turn things around. We can courageously drop our defenses and barriers to caring. We can turn the insanities of this world into happier realities by using our awesome power to see and create a different, better world for all.

 

I could not have imagined how lovable my former “enemies” could become—all my crosses-to bear, even my own useless ugly self—until I chose to see each person and each situation differently, with eyes that let the past go, let mistakes go, overlooked shortcomings and fear, and saw only good.

 

To be sure, I often forget to choose to see differently, moment-to-moment–that’s where the “I’ll never get anything right” part comes in….  Yes, I’ll keep on making mistakes, and add to the drama and confusion instead of transforming it—and so will everyone else. God had his reasons for making humans fallible, but he also made us capable of learning and loving.

 

When I look on others with loving, spiritual eyes, I give them an amazing gift—the gift of seeing themselves completely differently—more loving, more beautiful and good than they ever realized. My accepting vision accurately reflects back to them the truth about their deepest nature, which is no less than the most thoughtful present anyone can ever give to another human being.

 

We all wish we could receive only such loving gifts from one another. We appreciate it so much when others give us the benefit of the doubt, choose to see us in our best light and as our best-possible selves. What other kind of help could encourage us so much to become the best people we can be?

 

The gift of seeing our own strengths and goodness is not one we can easily give ourselves. It takes another person choosing to see us lovingly, to see our own selves at our best. Most often, we only know our love and power when it is reflected in the appreciation that is shining in the eyes of another, in response to our own similar gifts to them.

 

What a delightful moment-to-moment reality this can be: whenever we choose, we can see the best in others, see ourselves lovingly reflected in their eyes, and offer one another a new reality, a chance to see ourselves anew. Genuine mutual admiration societies are happy places, just as relationships based on fearful judgments are hotbeds only for more fear and sadness.

 

On an eternal scale, seeing everything spiritually is what we’re here for. God created each of our lives, and this wonderful planet, this universe, as his great gift to us, for our delight, but also for his. Our mission, should we decide to accept it, is to love his gift—our world, ourselves, each other—in each moment of eternity, asking his help to see his creations freshly each moment, through accepting, spiritual eyes.

 

We do not live in a “same-for-everyone” reality that is somehow “out there”—No. Instead, each of us uniquely reflects what’s “in here”— whatever belief systems we’ve chosen to embrace about how the world works. Yet, although we each experience our individual realities differently, eternal spiritual reality doesn’t change. The ultimate truths about what lasts eternally—God’s goodness and love for his creation—are truly beyond our mere human brains’ explanatory abilities. But even if we can’t explain it, we can experience eternal truth whenever we choose to.

 

Spiritual realities aren’t intuitively obvious in most day-to-day lives. We’re so used to our familiar, if less-than-pleasant, mundane realities that we overlook other perspectives. We're like goldfish swimming around and around in our bowls. We don’t even notice the water we're in because it’s always just sort of been there. We’re unwilling to create waves in our already turbulent inner lives by considering a radically different worldview.

 

If we’ve concluded that we’re pretty much alone in a meaningless universe, in competition with everyone else, forced to fight for every inch until we die, we can find all the evidence we need to continue to reinforce that belief system in everything we do, in everyone we meet, in everything we learn. As necessary, we’ll project what we believe onto our experiences, and act in ways that fulfill our prophecies.

 

Life becomes more and more difficult, interspersed with peaceful moments of refuge and transcendence when we intuit a world that makes more sense. But we keep turning back to what we know, or to what we think we know. We hang on to our tough-guy philosophies “for dear life,” because, no matter how hopeful alternative views may appear, no matter how hard our present lives are, we’re—sort of—used to them already. Our cold approach to life feels familiar, and what is familiar feels safer than launching into an unfamiliar world of ideas and relationships, into uncertain territory that turns our whole way of looking at life upside-down.  

 

Even if we don’t have a lot in our lives right now, at least we have what we know. Or we sort of have what we think we know. Or at least, we don’t have what we don’t know…we think. And for that small shred of certainty, we’re willing to sacrifice all other possible alternative realities. Too exhausted and beaten down from upholding our chaotic, leaky thought systems to try anything new, we settle for “being right” about what we already think; we cling desperately to our little lifeboats of certainty in our personal storms.

 

Thinking our belief system the least-worst option, we “right”-eously keep choosing to see a chaotic world full of unacceptable players—ourselves included—as more predictable, reliable, more controllable than any as-yet unknown, different worldview might be. Somehow, someday—we hope—we’ll learn how to manage the mean world we’ve chosen. Someday, surely, we’ll get used to it, learn how to deal with it—once we’ve figured out the rules.

 

But there are no rules for a spiritually empty world, a loveless, meaningless void. Life sucks and then you die. As life’s difficulties multiply, it becomes ever more important to be right about the way we’ve always seen things, because as long as we can keep on pounding away at what we think we know, as long as we can keep on looking into the same dark corners for the cheese that isn’t there anymore, as long as we can keep piling up the evidence that says “I’m right”—only then will we feel we have some chance of muddling through at least until we die–which is all that anyone can do anyway, no matter how we look at things….

 

Yet, over the course of a lifetime . . . some people seem generally contented, happy, resilient, positive, cheerful, optimistic, while the rest of us become more and more miserable. Why is that?

 

Tough-minded pragmatic stoics have lots of plausible theories to explain this phenomenon, theories which fit semi-satisfactorily, if not cozily, into their unhappy belief systems.

 

But what if the differences in the lives of accepting people, and resistant, fearful people, arise in large part mostly from their different choices about what they want to see, about what reality they choose to create, in the world, in their relationships…?

 

We can all choose to undertake a completely new life-task, a purpose different than any we’ve chosen before. And that new choice of purpose will make all the difference. We can choose to see the world, ourselves, and others as acceptable and lovable, through spiritual eyes, asking for the help we need to see each moment’s challenges, one by one, differently.

 

Yes, we’ll keep on making stupid mistakes—forever—and everyone else will too. Because we’re human, we’ll often forget to ask for help, or forget to act on it. But seeing through visionary spiritual sight isn’t as difficult a change as you might think. God only requires from us a tiny bit of willingness. He will handle all the rest.

 

He’ll take each mistake we offer him, all our sad stuff, and transform it—all of it—into something useful and good. Someday, too, he’ll take the new improved world we’ve made, all the happier realities we’ve created, and work the same wonderful transformations with it. We can’t do everything that’s needed, powerful though we are, but we can do what we can do—our small parts—and leave the rest up to him.

 

When we choose to see through spiritual eyes, the whole world quite miraculously will become a happier, more peaceful place, both for ourselves and for everyone else. Each time we remember to ask to see whatever comes our way differently, we take the small necessary step to change both what's “in here” and “out there.” As we invite God to do his mysterious work, we change reality.

 

 

 

E.P. Harmon welcomes your comments!

epharmon@adelphia.net

 

 

 

 

Of Mice-Like Men: Libby and Cheney

My country—the richest, most powerful country in the history of this planet, is currently in the hands of men who conceive of life, power, and politics in the meanest, smallest, most fearful, vengeful way imaginable.

 

Consider this quote in yesterday’s Washington Post (Sunday, October 23rd), from an article about I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby and Dick Cheney:

 

“Libby greatly admires the work of Victor Davis Hanson, a classicist and military historian who posits that warfare is an inevitable part of civilization, evil is a basic condition of humanity, and tyrants must be confronted by the harshest possible means. (In late 2002, a few months before the Iraq invasion, Cheney—also a Hanson devotee—invited the historian to the vice president’s mansion for a small dinner gathering that included Libby.)…Hanson’s stark perspective comports with Libby’s view on Iraq. He was among the administration’s fiercest proponents of the invasion, and his office prepared a 48-page document of intelligence on Iraq’s WMDs for Secretary of State Colin Powell’s speech to the United Nations in February 2003. (Powell couldn’t confirm a lot of the data and wound up not using much of it.)”

 

Humanity's greatest courageous and visionary leaders have historically appealed to and built upon the best that humanity is capable of, instead of looking for or reacting to the worst. How did our great country get put in charge of tiny, scared, quaking little mice?

 

I’m sure Libby and Cheney love their country, mean well, and work hard from within their narrow, frightened versions of how the world works, but they are benighted, misinformed, misguided, and do not boldly make policy or decisions based on the highest ideals and values that hold us all together and make our fragile planet go 'round.

 

We all must suffer some injustice, but we don't have to add to its sum. We can risk peace, not war.

 

I can only hope our most democratic processes soon remove from positions of influence forever, Libby, Cheney and other leaders who govern as they do.

 

Please send comments to epharmon@adelphia.net

Thanks, Eppy Harmon

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lead Me On, Oh Great Commander in Chief. But Whither?

My favorite new show, Commander in Chief, shows promise for extending West Wing’s visionary qualities, and then some. Too bad Commander also bodes equivalent stumbles along the same dark lines of its predecessor—too much emphasis upon the quick use of military force to resolve diplomatic crises.

 

Military force doesn’t solve problems, it creates them. Will Geena Davis, aka President Mackenzie, learn this while in office? Will Commander showcase the long list of options any nation has to throw at problems, other than the show and/or use of force? Will Commander de-emphasize testosterone-filled approaches, and demonstrate instead the range of strengths any leader, male or female, can find in more “feminine” approaches? The show's producers will be glad to know that I'm awaiting their answers in great suspense….

 

And what if Geena does experience a direct provocation by another government? Why not try really clever media coverage…. What if the American public insists on revenge and retaliation? Try education, forbearance, charity…. What if Americans die? Try rituals of national mourning for fallen martyrs, or any one of the other thousand approaches to diplomacy…. What if there’s a terrorist attack by a known force? Try investigations, and high-level meetings….

 

And keep on trying. Peace and democracy aren’t missions that can be accomplished. They’re missions that never end. You can’t end a war against an abstract noun. Besides, there will always be one more bomb-throwing terrorist to provide an excuse for one more retaliation. I hope Geena teaches us that sometimes you just have to endure a certain amount of injustice—but you almost never have to add to it.

 

What if a woman who is convicted of adultery is about to be buried to her neck in the sand and then stoned to death? Geena could have focused overwhelming international attention on that country’s leaders, and then shipped in thousands of well-paid, white-clad, unarmed international forces of young innocent collegiate pacifists, silent disapproving witnesses to evil deeds, all willing to die for their ideals—just as our current youthful military volunteers are willing to die for theirs.

 

What a moral message this would send! What culture could continue to kill unarmed, disapproving children while an international press looked on? Maybe the poor adulterer would die, but maybe no other adulterers would, the next time. Geena's point would be made, her lesson taught, her stance clarified, her insistence noted. Conversations would be started. Maybe minds would even be changed.

 

We don’t have to do away with our military forces. We can still use them to defend our country from those who would invade our shores or climb with their guns through our windows (I haven’t seen much of this lately, but it could happen…) We can still call up our national guard for times of natural catastrophes.

 

A new, improved Commander in Chief would have a few long-simmering unsolvable conflicts aggravatingly popping up throughout the show’s lifespan. We could watch these conflicts wend their ponderous and circuitous diplomatic ways through the series, in alarming fits and infuriating starts, week after week, year upon year—and each time, see Geena turn down the easy options of violence. We could grow to love the wisdom and expertise of her trusted diplomats, who have already spent half their lives preparing to tackle just such thorny problems, and who will spend the rest of their lives patiently addressing them, instead of mucking them up with ever more violence, leading, of course, to ever more hatred… and violence…and more hatred…and more violence.

 

I don’t want to see any more episodes in which Geena impresses me with fast, decisive, tough and completely hokey short-sighted violent “solutions” which only postpone and ultimately exacerbate the original problems (remember Iraq?) I want to see her impress me with her wisdom, vision, and forbearance. I want to see deliberate, consensus-building, thoughtful international answers bearing the weight of the whole world behind them.

 

I’d like to see well-written episodes dealing with moments of national hysteria over provocations, complete with their inexorable drumbeats in favor of retaliation, revenge and war, and then I want to see Geena demonstrate some of the myriad, no, infinite alternatives to loutish thuggery. Isn’t that what leadership is? Or is it really all about one's readiness to whip out one's six-guns and shoot ‘em up? I don’t think so. C’mon, TV producers, make my day….

 

I’d like to see Geena diplomatically rebuild a couple of really shaky international relationships, offer aid to one of our so-called enemies in their moment of need, implement fair trade rules for globalization…. I want to see her lead, and become even more visionary than she already is.

 

Some day, when Congress gets around to legislating a cabinet-level Department of Peace (H.R 3760 and S. 1756), I look forward to seeing the show belatedly renamed “Commander in Peace.”

 

Some day perhaps we’ll see Geena back again, a full-lipped, swivel-hipped Indian-style crone, still leading her tribe patiently and diplomatically past each new day's conflict toward the greater safety, prosperity and contentment that await us all on the other side.

 

 

 

A History of Violence Offers Hope For A Less-Violent Future

A History of Violence is a very good movie. Yes, the violence is graphic and hard to take, but that’s a positive thing in a movie intent on provoking thought and dialogue on the subject of violence. So, for you many testosterites (both male and female) who depend for your jollies upon superhuman heroes gloriously avenging the depraved acts of craven evildoers—and if you also happen to be married to a Quaker spouse—this is the family movie for you. If you gotta have gore, at least this gore isn’t simplistic; it’s powerful, purposeful, effective gore.

 

I was gripped and thoroughly entertained by A History of Violence. The production displayed a beautiful Casablancan integrity–nothing superfluous, nothing left out.

 

The movie’s many surprising moments of really funny dark humor were a nice added kick. At its blackest, life is ridiculously insane, and laughter covers the sad eyes of clowns; it's never either/or. Shakespeare knew this. So, this sad, funny, violent movie makes perfect sense as it moves along inexorably, belly laughs preceding abject tragedy setting up comic tittering introducing disaster….

 

History is also authentically moving, a tricky thing to do considering the thin fine line between effective emoting and hokey schmaltz. It’s a rare treat to have my jaded heartstrings expertly twanged by a good script in the hands of an inspired director leading brilliant actors.

 

History’s clarion response to the long-standing ethical question: When is violence morally justified? Only when you or someone you personally love is directly, persistently and seriously threatened. History’s imperfect characters conscientiously persevere in minding their own business, and endure the injustice of repeated outrageous attempts to provoke them to retaliatory violence–without adding to it–demonstrating the multitude of non-violent options available to unwilling participants.

 

I also appreciated the movie’s generous advocacy for second chances, and third ones, and however many it takes. In this movie, people who make big mistakes (no matter how big) receive support, not punishment–at least so long as they convincingly demonstrate conscientious intentions and results over time. History’s message–that sometimes motivated people can and do change—isn’t heavy-handedly religious; Tom admits that even after three long years in the desert, he wasn’t really born again until he met his wife. We all need both God and man to lift us up over our barriers to caring.

 

The very explicit but lively and original sex scenes were touching and memorable, and essential to the movie’s theme, since affection, loyalty, intimacy, and sexuality are often all that hold humanity to sanity and purpose.

I enjoyed watching Tom, like Lady Macbeth, futilely attempt to scrub the blood from his hands, and then receive the grace to be washed clean, rebaptised—forgiven–probably for the seventy-times-seventh time.

 

I wish the writers had clearly disavowed any hint that a schizophrenic split-personality-thing might be going on. For a confused moment I thought the story was bending that way, which would have disappointed me. I was relieved when it turned out to be about one man’s honest efforts at transformation.

 

Tom’s brief but telling dialogue with his brother offered a perfectly adequate argument for his stunning attempt to climb up from the horrendous dark pit of his childhood environment.

 

The movie offered several intriguing mini-plots—one for each character—most of them feel-good stories anyone could relate to. When Tom’s son finally got around to soundly beating up the kids who had continually attacked him, our theatre audience cheered. And when our thoroughly besmirched and discredited, yet undeniably righteous champion returned home, his family’s acceptance felt honest and right.

 

So why is it that we Americans still feel comfortable flinging our invading armies into the far corners of our empire, to threaten the persons and homes and families and livelihoods of complete strangers who are quietly trying to get ahead, in the lands of their ancestors? Where do we get off invading other countries, tearing up their infrastructure, disrupting their social fabric, blowing up their children? A History of Violence should make perfectly clear that people (of all creeds) who are doing their best to care for their families deserve to be left alone.

 

If my gentle reader still holds a belief that our superior culture justifies empire-building, I suggest you go back to your Bible, perhaps starting with the part about the kindly Jewish itinerant rabbi, Jesus, delivering his Beatitudes and his Sermon on the Mount. As A History of Violence demonstrates: fighting for peace on this incredibly small, interconnected and fragile planet–unless the bad guys are really climbing in your window—makes about as much sense in the real world as it does in the movies.

 

 

 

James Agee Does Bill Bennett

If Bill Bennett had just said, “abort every baby” or even “abort every white baby” instead of “abort every black baby,” he could have made his point just as well without coming across like a totally insensitive Ku Klux Klanner.

 

On the other hand, this whole controversy boils down to: How are we treating all the babies who are born into our culture? Not to mention, our planet?

 

Here’s what James Agee had to say about the matter, back in 1939:

 

“In every child who is born, under no matter what circumstances, and of no matter what parents, the potentiality of the human race is born again. And in him, too, once more, and of each of us, our terrific responsibility towards human life; towards the utmost idea of goodness, of the horror of error, of God.” (from Let Us Now Praise Famous Men)

 

 

(I would like to add that I think Bill Bennett a fine, admirable person who has worked hard and taken many personal risks in his life in order to add beauty and goodness to the world. Like all of us, he's entitled to mistakes and shortcomings, none of which are important. When someone has such long suits, and works so hard to make the most of them, sometimes their (our) short suits seem (in contrast) very short. I thank the world for Dr. Bennett's gifts and life, wish him well, and trust that he won't be daunted by his recent negative publicity….) Keep up the good work, Dr. Bennett!

 

 

 

Acceptance 13 – More questions about “acceptance”….

(This is the latest segment of a 15-part series of questions and answers about “acceptance” which I began posting early in 2005. I think the series is best read from the beginning, so click on the topic “acceptance” if you would like to see the whole series. All the October posts to the series were written quite a while ago, but I never got around to posting them. So I'm doing it now, in case readers want to read the complete series, as originally written….Thanks! Eppy)

I guess it's impossible to fix/change the whole world and everyone in it, and I guess I couldn't control it if I could fix it. But it's very hard to fix me, and all my reactions. I've spent a long time accumulating all this stuff.

So what else are you doing for the rest of your life? I'm just suggesting a moment-to-moment substitute. Currently, you freak out at a lot of things. I'm just suggesting that you try acceptance instead of freaking, and see what that changes. It's a start. Both are hard paths, but one leads to peace of mind.

How does acceptance work, in psychological terms?

Everyone's experience in life is different, so although what is “real”–“out there”–may be the same for all of us, what is “real”–“in here”–our experience of life, of others, of ourselves, of the here-and-now–is unique to each individual. So, there is the stuff “out there,” and there is the stuff we add to it to make it ours, all our thoughts, emotions, images, explanations, history, fears, hopes, dreams–you know, our “stuff.”

Acceptance is a practice that helps us change the way we respond to the stuff “out there” in more effective ways. When we practice acceptance, when we work to “be with” the stuff “out there” without adding all our own personal stuff on top of it, we learn to operate with much less extra baggage added on to “what is” in life, in the world, in ourselves, and in others. It really helps to notice, to be aware, of how much stuff (often negative) we bring to what “just is.” And it really is amazing how rich and full and interesting life is, just as it is, when we can live in the present and interact with life without a lot of heavy baggage interfering with our immediate interactions with “what is,” in the present moment.

Where does acceptance fit in with philosophical traditions? Religious traditions?

Acceptance of “what is” has long been counseled in all philosophical and religious traditions. Acceptance seems to be the beginning of wisdom, and is often only attained, if at all, in maturity or old age, often because life is too difficult by then to face without some help. Acceptance offers a lot of help. Maybe our smaller, faster globe has sped up life so much today that sensitive people need to learn acceptance much younger, just to keep on living.

I believe in the Bible as the infallible, direct, consistent and always true Word of God. How does acceptance square with the teachings of the Bible?

The Book of Job, many of the Psalms and Proverbs, and many other teachings in the Old Testament are all about learning acceptance. Jesus always counseled accepting the will of God, i.e., “what is,” and set a fine example of submitting his will to his father's, despite his trials and terrible crucifixion. Nothing in the Bible contradicts the many benefits of acceptance. Acceptance doesn't imply complacency or inaction or indifference.

I believe in a clear right and wrong, an obvious good and an obvious evil. How does acceptance square with these beliefs?

Strong convictions, strong values, and a strong sense of morality are real assets when they are not misused. We all have experienced people who follow the letter of the law and miss the spirit. Jesus told us clearly to treat others as we would like to be treated. He also said that love of God and man contained “all the law, and the prophets.” Acceptance is not about making everything mushy and gray, or accepting bad, wrong things. It's about living peacefully and graciously and lovingly in the present, with the things that can't be changed now, so that we can rise up during the next instant calmly and effectively, hopefully to right the wrongs, and to shine the light of good on darkness.

I'm terribly afraid of dying. How can acceptance help me?

You're not afraid of dying, but of the struggle against dying. You're afraid of your life ending before you're finished with what you want to do, afraid of the difficult process of dying, and afraid of what suffering might come after death. Many religions recommend dying before death: sitting with others who are dead or dying, and meditating on death. Acceptance of death and dying comes with not pushing away the thoughts of death, just sitting quietly with thoughts of death, while you're alive.

While you're dying is not the best possible time to come to peace with death, because dying is hard work, because sometimes it happens suddenly, or painfully. And besides, dying, like being born, is something new, it's change, and thus, is tiring, scary work. Those few who enjoy a peaceful death are usually those who worked to prepare themselves for its acceptance in advance, by accepting the idea of it, by dealing with it.

How can you accept death while living? Sit with it. Don't try to think about it, or look at it, or wallow in all the scary, sad feelings you may have attached to death. Instead, just be with death itself. Just notice all the negative and unhappy stuff that comes up for you despite your willingness to stay unresisting and quiet with your thoughts of death.

What will happen when you try this? The more you pray/meditate/rest unresistingly with the idea of death, the less frightening you will find it to be, until one day, death will just be one more door opening to one more new and different place, a door you will push open with curiosity and eagerness.

I'm shy. How can acceptance help me?

Spend some time with your feelings, right now, in the present moment, about being shy. Eventually, shyness will seem more like what it is–merely an irrational emotional reaction to new situations.

You're afraid of feeling shy because in the past the feeling of shyness panicked you and distracted you from focusing on what you wanted to accomplish. You're not afraid of new things, new situations, or whatever or whoever is facing you, but instead, of that feeling of being paralyzed, helpless, panicky. Get used to the feeling and stop running away from it, pushing it away, resisting it. Go with it. Be with it. Stay with it and stop fighting it. And meanwhile, get into the new person or situation before you as well, without resisting them. Accepting the scariness of shyness, and looking more closely at the needs and requirements of the new person or situation will help you move more quickly and calmly to meet those needs.

I'm generally uncomfortable with members of the opposite sex. How can acceptance help me?

Most of your discomfort with members of the opposite sex is “stuff” that you have learned about them that may not be so, certainly with individuals, and probably not generalizable either. Don't resist all the negativity you feel about them, don't push it away; try to accept that you have a lot of negative stuff on the opposite sex. Try to be aware of it all, be with it, and know that all those negative beliefs and feelings are very real to you, if not necessarily true in every situation.

Eventually, if you can learn to accept your own reactions and beliefs, you will gradually learn to react to each person that you meet or interact with freshly, without all the stuff you've put onto men or women in the past. You'll find that you're not really uncomfortable with given individuals, but instead, with all the stuff you've assumed about them. Look at all that stuff, accept your fear or distaste or judgment about it, and then look again at individuals. You'll see something new.

Sex and sexuality are difficult for me in many ways. How can acceptance help me?

You're probably less nervous about actual sex and sexuality than you are about all the stuff you've personally attached to the idea of sex. When you think about sexuality in its most basic form–a drive to reproduce—and then you look at all the cultural, emotional and mental stuff we add onto it, it's no surprise that our sexual mechanisms feel gummed up.

Stop pushing your own sexuality away. Accept the idea that among all your other identities, you are a sexual being. Just “be with” all the fears and discomforts that being a sexual being bring up for you. They are all your unique added “stuff” as an individual, separate from any particular sexual act. When you allow yourself to get into “being OK with” all the stuff you previously resisted, pushed away, fought against, sexual relations lose a lot of their heaviness, and become a lot more simple, natural, and in-the-present “what is,” without all the heavy stuff you add onto them.

I can handle my own sorrows, but I can't handle my children's, past, present or future. How can acceptance help me?

Well, for one thing, you don't have to handle them. Your children do. And they will do it better if they have a calm, courageous, supportive friend to encourage them along the way…. But sit with your present fears and sadness. Stop pushing them away. Just be with them for awhile, without reacting to them. Observe them, know them, accept that what is, is. With this calm and lack of resistance, you will be much better able to offer your children the peaceful support they need to move forward in life toward their own dreams and goals and greater understanding.

My life is OK as long as I can work, stay busy, and contribute. But I'm getting older, frailer, less capable, and it scares me. What can acceptance do for me?

Spend some time with the idea of helplessness. Don't think about it, react to it or develop a lot of mental pictures about it. Just sit with the idea unresistingly. Most of the reactive stuff you have to helplessness is about your own sense of self, about your actions in the past and your hopes for your own future. You don't, for instance, react against helplessness in others, you don't judge it as wrong or disgusting, except as it reflects on thoughts of your own helplessness.

Try to sit quietly with the idea of helplessness, and as the reactions and thoughts and pictures come up, notice them, accept them unemotionally, and let them go. Eventually you'll realize that complete helplessness, without all the stuff that people tend to attach to the idea when it applies to themselves, is quite neutral. It's just what it is. Then extend this acceptance to the idea of your being gradually less capable. Finally, look at your present capabilities, with new eyes.

How does acceptance work? I mean, what's the trick of it?

Acceptance is about learning to stay in the present moment, and be with, unresistingly, what is in the present, no matter how frightening your reactions and feelings might seem. In learning to do this, you learn a lot about what is not part of the present moment. You learn that your culture and your experience have added a lot of emotional and mental stuff to the present moment that put a lot of heaviness and fear into it. When you can be with the present moment and its challenges, separated from all of the extra baggage of culture, individual experience, assumptions and fears, then you can handle it, move past it, and move forward effectively toward making the changes you want to see in your life.

It's fine and dandy to “fix” myself so I'll be more peaceful and happy, but what about the rest of the world? Does acceptance mean that I jsut abandon everyone and everything and go within and be peaceful and meditate or something?

Hey, fixing yourself ain't all that easy…. It took each of us quite a long time to get so messed up…. So, a certain amount of time spent working at acceptance in all the various areas of our lives that we've messed up is necessary….

But every step in learning acceptance in the various areas of your life will also be steps toward being more effective in relationships and in making the difference you want in your life and in the world. It all happens simultaneously. The more peaceful and accepting you can be about “what is,” the more committed and persistent and persevering and focused you will become, the more calm and positive and effective you will become. Working at acceptance changes the way you respond to situations and people, which will make you happier and more effective.

I can't stand relativism. “Everything's relative” is such a weak place to come from. Everything's not relative; it's clearly one thing or another–good or bad, right or wrong. So we can accept what's right and good, and reject what's wrong and bad. Right?

Strong values, strong convictions, a strong moral and ethical sense are great gifts. They come from a lifetime of assessing situations and trying to make the choices and decisions that are the most helpful. The hardest decisions are the ones in which we weigh two goods against each other, or try to find a best alternative among few attractive options–in other words, the gray areas….

Killing is wrong, but what about in a just war? Divorce is wrong, but what if abuse and adultery are committed? Shall I feed the baby, get dinner for the family, or respond to my son's urgent request for understanding on his homework? And so on. In real life, we have to weigh individual goods and evils, rights and wrongs, relative to some other goods and evils, rights and wrongs.

Acceptance that life is very difficult and that each moment presents brand new challenges for acceptance of “what is,” right now, that moral decisions are often difficult and perplexing, allows us to move forward calmly and lovingly to make good decisions and choices about the difficult gray areas, the areas of moral/ethical confusion that we often find ourselves in.

 

 

 

Acceptance 12 – Life is too damn hard, and so is change. I accept that I need to give up and nothing is ever going to change. Ever. There. Are you satisfied?

Life is hard and so is change. And yes, you can accept that the world and people are going to always be … natural … challenging … the way they are. No surprises there. But give up? Give up what? The struggle?

First, consider letting go of the idea of “struggle.” Think instead of peacefully chipping away at long-term open-ended tasks.

Imagine a circle drawn around you–your circle of comfort.

If you choose to give up on changing things, on chipping away, your life won't get easier, because your “circle of comfort” will shrink if you stop working for change.

If you choose to stop pushing out on your circle of comfort, the world has a way of pushing back in on you, hard. So either way, you'll end up pushing–either for your own chosen goals, or to keep your circle of comfort from shrinking down to nothing but discomfort.

So why not pick a few things that you want to improve or change, and push a little at them? Better to push than be pushed, and doing one of the two seems to be the only choice we have. We don't seem to have the choice to hide out, quit, be neutral for too long, because the world just keeps on pushing. Your zone of comfort and peace keeps getting smaller unless you keep pushing its boundaries out. So pick some things to push for and work at. Yes, it's a lot of trouble, but so is doing nothing.

What I'd like to change is everything about me, everyone else and the world. But it ain't gonna happen. So now what?

So approach life the way you would approach eating an elephant. Bite by bite. So you can't do everything. So do something. What are you going to do today?

Sometimes I can accept things, and when I do, everything does seem different. But then I can't keep it going. I slip into my old ways and thoughts and everything's the same again, the same old fight, the same old thoughts. I give up!

When you have spent your life up until now overwhelmed by the immensity of its problems and challenges, it's hard to dim that awareness down to just right-now, just this-moment, just today, which frankly, is much more interesting, fuller, richer, and more potentially powerful than any big picture. But when you feel overwhelmed by the enormity of life and its problems, go small, go now, go present, and accept what is, today, now. Accept what's challenging you today. And from the peace that that acceptance brings, in the present, you will find the energy and the peace to move forward on the small steps you choose to take today.

But each day, when you feel discouraged? Stop. Accept whatever it is in-the-now that you're resisting, and you'll be able to move forward. This can happen in a second if that's the time you have.

Ask and it shall be given unto you, seek and ye shall find, knock and it shall be opened unto you. Just ask for the acceptance you need, and for the answers.

I'm sick of the pressure to do different, to be better, to always be pushing for change. Yet I'm not satisfied with the way things are. How can acceptance help me?

Probably there are ways that you are that you like, even if some others don't, and you're naturally resisting their pressure for you to change those. Or there are things about yourself you've accepted as what-is, and you are currently unmotivated to change in those areas. Acceptance of what-is today includes acceptance of yourself as-you-are and others as-they-are, including their unwanted pressures. When you can accept both of these, you will be in a peaceful place to work in small steps toward changing the things you choose to work on. Let go of the rest, for now.

 

 

 

Acceptance 11 – I hate the world. It's a mess. How can accepting a big mess help or change anything?

God apparently intended for the world to be as it is, since this is the way he created it, and he is all-powerful and all-wise and all-good, by definition. He doesn't mess up, and he didn't mess up with the world. For whatever reason, he wanted it as it is: based on the evidence, he seems to like immutable natural laws–birth, death, rebirth, cycles, change over time, variety, diversity, potential for anything and everything. His creatures (including us) seem capable of amazing greatness and smallness. That's what he made, what he wanted, and what he called 'good.' Who are we to argue with god?

So, accept the way the world is, notice that actually, it's pretty interesting and full of possibility, even if heartache and challenge and loss are also part of it. Then decide what you want to do with your time on earth, as everyone else will. Will we/they change the world? Yes, in small or big ways. Will we/they make the world or human nature fundamentally different from what God made it? No. But that still leaves each of us a lot of room for play, fun, ambition, profit, loss, adventure, accomplishment, and changes of all kinds.

Everyone drives me crazy. Everyone irritates me, is stupid, mean, crazy. And that's not going to change. So how can acceptance help?

It's true that people will always be as they are–fallible, weak, mistaken, often harmful, etc. You're right that that will never change, because God made all of us capable of being all things–harmful, harmless, helpful, and all the things in between, as we choose.

But that doesn't mean you have to accept being irritated or hurt by others, either now or forever. You can work with your reaction to other people, but the first step is to accept them as they are, to learn to accept that they are what they are and may or may not ever change, as they choose.

With that acceptance, you can go a very long way toward changing your own irritation or over-reaction to the way they are, though. Your high blood pressure and racing angry thoughts and self-righteously indignant pulse can change. Acceptance of others as-they-are-now, along with acceptance of yourself as you are now, can lead to a greater quietness, gentleness, peace of mind with others, and with yourself. But acceptance comes first.

First you gotta get that they are who they are and you are who you are, and for now, you can be OK with what is. Armed with that first step, with that calm, in the present, you can take the small steps that will change your reaction to others, which in itself, often makes a huge difference in others' behavior toward you. Day by day, as you accept others today, you will find that your relationships improve, are calmer, easier, friendlier. They'll just work better all around.

I really don't think much will ever change–not me, not them, nothing. Things are what they are. I am what I am. What will be will be. How can acceptance help or change anything?

Remember the serenity prayer, the one about knowing what things to accept and what things to change? You're right that the world will stay the world, with all its natural heartaches and losses and limitations. And you're right that people will always be people, forever capable of mistakes, failings, weaknesses, fears, foolishness, harm.

What you can change is: all the rest. Given what you have to work with–nature's laws and fallible humans–there is still a lot you can do. You can't make anything perfect, but you can chip away and improve it, for a time. Look around you and you'll see millions of people doing just that, making themselves and their situations better. Not all it once, but very gradually, step by step, over the course of their lives. They pick a few things to work on–whatever they find most urgent or interesting–and then chip away at them. What will you choose to chip away at?

 

 

 

Acceptance 9 – Acceptance seems to work, but it's so hard. Any suggestions? Help?

One of the things that 'just is,' is that change is sometimes slow and difficult (and sometimes instant and easy too, as in those happy moments when the dawn breaks and everything is suddenly nicer and clearer and we understand some things that we didn't understand before–and now everything seems much easier.) When you ask for acceptance (and it does help to ask for it) don't put a time limit on yourself, don't struggle, don't worry about speed. (If you don't have much time, just give it what you have and that will be enough.) Just stay in the right-now for-the-moment, forget yesterday and who you were then, let go of worrying about tomorrow (it won't do any good anyway), and just be OK with right now, with this minute, today.

Another thing that helps in learning acceptance is taking quiet time to just sit and be in the space of accepting-now-what-is. If you can find a few moments to be by yourself, meditate or pray, sitting or kneeling–and just be in the present, accepting what is in the present without thinking. Mentally make an effort to stay with the very stuff you used to push away and run away from.

Noticing and replacing non-accepting thoughts with other, accepting thoughts works. Make up your own happy mantra; my favorite is 'Surrender.'

Here's another approach: Get active when you're feeling non-accepting. It's hard to hold unpleasant thoughts and feelings when you're busy doing physical stuff, although not all people can be active (an area of 'limitation' one can learn to accept.)

Do something nice for someone: It's hard to think bad thoughts when you're being nice. Think positively: try to find something good about everything and everyone (including yourself). Count your blessings. Thinking good thoughts is an approach which really works when I can't fall asleep. I list every little thing I own, every face that ever smiled my way even for a minute, every raindrop, every ray of sunshine, the shoes on my feet and the spoon I eat with. All are gifts that I have been blessed with (think of life without them!) It helps me to accept my challenges when I take time to remember how blessed I am.

Modern American Relationships: Far Better and Far Worse

Do you really like someone else as much as you like you?

 

Achieving all the things you want in life may require every ounce of your drive, talent, time and money. Are you really that concerned about helping another particular someone through their next fifty-plus years, as much as you’re concerned about helping you? Do you even need someone else’s help with your own goals, enough to wholeheartedly offer an equitable trade of your time, money, effort, and talent?

 

Listed below are some “traditional benefits of marriage.” To “receive” support in any of them, you should reasonably plan to make at least an equivalent (if not necessarily equal) contribution to your partner. Keep in mind that all these “benefits” are on the table—negotiable, not “assumable”—in a modern relationship, so consider what you want from him as well as what you want to contribute/offer:

 

A peaceful, comfortable, welcoming home;

One (or ten) good, happy, healthy, relaxed, fun, interesting, loving kids;

Big money and the material options, security, and comforts it might provide, or;

A steady but modest income with the more modest material options, comforts, and security it might provide;

Personal freedom and flexibility;

Support, time, care and fun, both for and with two different families and two different sets of friends;

Hobbies, talents, and avocations;

Big or modest careers;

Formal education, and continuing (lifetime) education;

Religious and/or spiritual beliefs, practice and traditions;

Political commitments;

Health and fitness commitments;

Romance;

Being/having a loyal helping friend during crises;

Being/having a loyal helping friend during everyday ups and downs;

Travel;

High quality, reliable sex;

Positive and frequent companionship;

Sharing of mutual and different interests;

Community advocacy and activism;

Intimacy/trust/openness/honesty/talking/sharing;

Kindness, acceptance, and appreciation;

Mutual support for whatever seems most important to each of you;

A lavish amount of attentiveness to you and your needs.

 

If one or more of the above goals is very important to you, you’ll have less time and money and energy to spend on the other ones (thus lowering your odds of success on them.)

 

Whether you achieve any of the above goals will come down mainly to how hard and single-mindedly you and/or your partner are willing to work at making them happen.

 

If you know you require any one (or many) of the above goals in order to be happy, and if you’re sure you want to spend your life with a lifelong partner, you’d do best not to look for one….

 

…And instead, create a life you can love on your own, by working hard to achieve goals that are important to you. When you have that good (not perfect) life, look around and notice who fits into it well. If you keep your eyes open, not for romance and passion (although they’re nice too) you may see a friend who fits well into your life and work and fun and friends and family, and who shares many of your values and goals.

 

Observe how your friend treats (and talks about) the other people in his life; how he treats them is how he’ll treat you, when the newness has worn off. You certainly can’t go by what anyone says to you, or how they treat you, especially when they’re in hot pursuit with hormones raging.

 

None of the “traditional benefits of marriage” listed above can reasonably be “understood” or “expected,” and certainly none can “go without saying” in any relationship. Widespread divorce and marital dissatisfaction should tell you that. It will do you no good at all, later, to be right about how wonderful you were and what a jerk he was (or vice versa). Besides, you would really resent him assuming anything “traditional” or “understood” about you, wouldn’t you? He will too.

 

All young people have big dreams and agendas. Relationships that work well are often the ones in which both partners want many of the same things, because it’s really hard to spend your time, energy, and money on goals you don’t much care about.

 

Regardless of how nice your beloved may be, you will be the one who will be required to do most of the work toward those particular goals which are most important to you—whether it be children, career, home, travel, or whatever. Two people rarely desire something equally; most of the time, values are a little different—so don’t expect your partner to be equally dedicated to your “things.” (Just because he consents to a second—or first, or third, or sixth—child, don’t assume he’s equally interested in doing the work necessary to raise it. Don’t argue for a big yard if you don’t like yard work, or insist on a big house unless you like home maintenance. Don’t get a cat unless you’re willing to clean the cat box….)

 

If you and your partner have distinctly different goals, abilities, talents and interests, you can still trade “yours” for “his.” However, we are not talking here about tit-for-tat trading, which is a disgusting process that is never fair, kind or equitable, and which will kill your relationship.

 

Some arbitrary examples of harmonious “trading” are: she handles the finances but he does the groceries, cooking and kitchen cleaning (or vice versa, on all of these:) She does the yard work and gardening while he does all the heavy, physically challenging chores. He listens to her problems and worries, and she offers him intimacy and pleasure on his emotional and logistical schedule (not just hers.) She works hard to make a good living for everyone and he forgoes the financial independence, career rewards, and other extras he could earn so that they both have free time for themselves and each other. She helps family members with projects and he creates enjoyable family holidays, vacations and gatherings. She came into the marriage with previous commitments to a daughter, parents and grandparents; he strives to make them all feel loved, welcome, and cherished. He brought a daughter, three sisters and a parent, and she befriends and helps them all. He teaches his new daughter to read, write, draw, sing, and write poetry, chauffeurs her, baby-sits her and teaches her to love fruits and veggies; she supports her new daughter’s sports enthusiasms with her participation, and with sports-camps, and pays her way through college.

 

Relationships that work are never about tit-for-tat exchanges, because no two people are alike in their strengths and talents and offerings. Good partnerships can’t be about trying to make things come out even, or about insisting that someone else do more, or be different, more “equal” or better than they are. Relationships only work when they’re about loving and accepting and forgiving people as they are (and we all make mistakes, and have much to learn)—and about helping each other to achieve our most cherished goals, enjoy our own unique kinds of pleasures and become whoever it is we want to be.

 

My primary “guidelines” for predicting a happy relationship are:

 

Self-reliance and emotional security: When you can handle most things in your own life—most of your own needs and goals—without a partner, then you’re probably ready for a relationship.

 

Forbearance: Neither partner believes he or she can or should try to change their partner or tell them what to do. Both are prepared to love each other just the way they are, to forgive and overlook shortcomings, and to appreciate whatever each has to offer.

Unselfishness: Both are “givers”—supportive of whatever is most important to the other, even when they don’t particularly value it, agree with it, prefer to pay for it, or understand why anybody would want it. What is important to your partner will change in the most unpredictable (and expensive) ways as years go by. Good relationships are all about being a flexible, supportive friend to someone who is himself  rapidly changing and growing in the context of a crazy modern world.

 

Kindness:  Both partners treat each another as gently and kindly and supportively and forgivingly as they would like themselves to be treated (the golden rule….) We all want partners who are helpful, accepting, appreciative, courteous, considerate, charming, loyal, tender, open, honest and loving (i.e., perfect) in all circumstances, but most especially during our worst and most difficult times. Turnabout (treating him just exactly as you would like to be treated, always) is not only fair play; it’s the only thing that works in relationships.

 

Acceptance: Neither partner sweats the daily details of day-to-day life. Every couple is different and each person’s style is unique, but nobody’s perfect and life is full of heartaches and disappointments. There are no generalizable stylistic rules for relationships except the golden rule, and that’s only a rule for one’s own behavior, not a rule to monitor others’ behavior with.

 

Commitment: This is nothing more (and nothing less) than placing a very high value on following through on decisions you’ve made—to care for, build on, nurture, and redeem–over the long run, any given particular relationship with an interesting but fallible human being, despite the many inevitable challenges and disappointments and heartaches that will assail both him and you, as a couple. Commitment implies your readiness to take personal responsibility and make the necessary compromises for doing what is necessary to make that long-term relationship work well for both of you. Commitment itself has little or nothing to do with passion, feeling “in love,” romance, excitement, adventure, newness, sex, ideals of womanly or masculine perfection, or any other competing value (see list above, again.)

 

Forgiveness: People make mistakes. Huge ones. And a million little ones, over and over again. Whenever you’re the one messing up big time, whenever you’re the one looking really bad (which will be just as often as it’s always been), you’ll still hope that your partner will nevertheless appreciate your efforts and good intentions, and will forget about all the rest and give you another chance. That’s what your partner will hope for too, from you. In good relationships, both very imperfect partners offer each other a brand new start every day, and even, every minute.

 

Divisions of domestic chores, career compromises, where to live, children (whether, how many, and who will raise them), time with family and friends, how to handle money—all of these are up for grabs, and require lots of communication. Anything at all goes—if it works for both of you. Remember that each value and goal you commit to as a couple constrains all future alternative options.

 

If you make a thoughtful partnering decision (and are unusually lucky) you may find yourself pair-bonded with a best friend who makes your unquestionably challenging lifetime a lot better in many ways. It’s not an unreasonable dream to find a partner who will treat you like a princess and be at your most idealistically romantic beck and call—no matter whether you’re up or down—but only if you intend to return the favor during all his bizarre, unreasonable and unpredictable mood shifts and behavior phases….

 

If you cry “sexism” whenever it’s convenient—i.e., when you don’t want to do something “traditional”—and then turn around and insist that he fulfills sexist roles when you want him to do “expected” or “assumed” traditional stuff, you are participating in what’s called a “bad faith” relationship. Do something else, anything else, because bad faith approaches quickly kill all that is of real value in relationships, and people just don’t stay in unrewarding pairings very long anymore.

 

Treating a relationship like an entitlement program doesn’t work. Otherwise sane and kind people sometimes assume that “they should reasonably be able to expect” certain things that they’re not getting from their relationship, and so they turn those relationships into never-ending wars or competitions, full of resentments, one-upsmanship, wanting to be right, pushing, prodding, criticizing, nagging, laying guilt trips, manipulating, and seeing the worst in their partner—all because their “reasonable” expectations aren’t being met.

 

Sometimes perfectly nice, well-intentioned people end up with unappreciative, inflexible, or just plain clueless, obtuse, or unkind partners.

 

Some poor souls marry a sweet sexy romantic babe with the expectation of continued comfort, intimacy and regular sex, and end up with hardly any sex at all, no romance, and no sweetness or appreciation.

 

So go slow and be smart; or, as the saying goes, “Marry in haste; repent at leisure.”

 

But get this: nothing–no action or attitude or anything else your partner does or says—ever gives you the right or the excuse to act like a creep. You don’t ever have to participate in any process you don’t like. No one can “make you” act like or do or say anything. If your partner wants to be an awful person, that doesn’t mean you have to be one.

 

Some couples who are unhappily matched choose to stay together for a variety of reasons. If this is your choice, your best chance for enjoying some modicum of contentment is to go ahead and be the best partner you can be, no matter how unfair or lopsided your acceptance and kindness may seem. Keep looking for and appreciating his/her best qualities and, as much as possible, let go of their worst. Just because you’ve bonded unwisely or unluckily does not legitimize retaliatory equivalent smallness and unkindness and cruelty and controlling. Besides, such behavior will certainly make your bad situation worse.

 

It makes no sense whatsoever to try to change someone. You can stay with him and be tolerant and accepting. Or you can get the hell out of there. But if you stay, and keep trying to change your partner to suit yourself, you’ll fail, and you’ll both be even more miserable—because no matter how good you are, you’re really really not clever or persistent enough to change someone else.

 

People do sometimes change, but it’s almost never because of how much someone else wanted them to change. People make positive changes on their own agendas, for their own reasons, and sometimes people change in negative ways too. But they almost never change because you want them to. Communicating your needs clearly and lovingly sometimes leads to change; sometimes it doesn’t.

 

No one has the right to settle old gender scores with new partners, or to insist that others see gender issues the same way as they do. In fact, no one has a right to lean on anyone else, not only because it doesn’t do any good, but because it just makes everybody miserable. We’re all imperfect and we all want acceptance, appreciation and support for our small feeble miserable best efforts. Period.

 

Lots of people, even in 2005, use sex manipulatively, to persuade their partner to love them—and then “change” later. This is another example of a bad faith approach that doesn’t work over the long run. Honesty is the heart of intimacy and all good sexual relationships—regardless of the vast variety in sexual styles and interests and alternatives.

 

If your partner’s not happy, you won’t be happy. You can gamble your life on romance, reassuring yourself that you’ll both be deliriously happy forever because you’re so devoted and giving and he’s so hot; and you won’t be the first fool to do so. However, only a handful of those who are initially attractive and pleasant when newly in love are also contentable with you (or anyone else) over the long run. Being perfect can be fun for a few months, but if you’re holding your breath and staying on your best behavior until after you’re safely paired (after which you plan to “relax”) he’s not gonna be happy when he finds out the truth, and you won’t be happy, either.

 

Falling in love is all about mystery, sexual attraction, passion, and romance, which is too bad, because a happy relationship, more often than not, is more about tolerant, accepting friends helping friends. The best thing to have in your bed over the long run (I promise you, even better than a teddy bear) is your best friend.

 

If your partner wants things done better than you care to do them, or different, he can do them himself. Perhaps his good example and higher standards will win you over, perhaps not. Many things just won’t get done, including your most cherished things. Or they’ll get done “wrong.” Nagging and criticism, which are about trying to change people, sometimes “helps” get things done, but your partner won’t like being around you any more, which seems an unwise tradeoff.

 

It doesn’t work to compete with your partner’s family, children, friends, career, or passions. On the other hand, it does work to befriend, support, and try to understand and even like every one of them with every ounce of your willingness.

 

Both partners will find it profitable to use common-sense, traditional approaches that are recommended for every relationship, such as: be the best person you can be, keep your agreements, take good care of yourself and your friend, pay attention, be positive and look for the good, stay healthy, stay in the present, do more than your “fair share,” and spoil each other disgracefully in each of the very unique and particular ways you each most enjoy being spoiled (which are never the same for any two people, so pay attention….)

 

No one is perfect, but nearly everyone can find a suitable companion (that person who feels lucky to be with you, and vice versa.) You’re much more likely to find that good match if you’re not spending time “while looking” hanging out with Mr. Wrong.

 

If you slow down, focus on making yourself a good life, and make the most of every single relationship in your life, if you give your best and learn the lessons life offers you, you’ll be less likely, someday, to say….

 

I was duped. I settled. I was tricked. I was hoodwinked. I was blinded by love. I changed. I fell out of love. We were wrong for each other. He stopped loving me. He found someone else. He found everyone else. I didn’t know what I wanted. He didn’t say what he wanted. We didn’t communicate. He couldn’t trust. He wasn’t good enough. He didn’t want what I want. He wasn’t like me. He didn’t like me. Living with him wasn’t what I thought. He isn’t what I want. I didn’t respect him. I rushed into it. I gave up. He gave up. He didn’t try. I didn’t know. I didn’t think. He didn’t care enough. Neither did I….